Log

Append-only. Keep prefix exact: grep "^## \[" log.md | tail -5.

[2026-05-23] wiki seeded

• schema (CLAUDE.md), purpose.md established
• worked examples: facilitator fork (resolved/superseded), twelve-steps (waning)
• awaiting ingest of: System Map, Guiding Principles v3, Twelve Steps v1, Self-Evaluation (Six Facets), and the rest of the team’s doc corpus

[2026-05-23] ingest | EPI Guiding Principles v3

• source: raw/EPI_Integrity_Layer_v3.md — Working Draft v3, For Team Review
• layer touched: layer 2 (Principles / Guiding Principles) — all hardening; none ratified
• pages added (22 principle pages, all status: under-review):
  • wiki/guiding-principles/principle-1.md through principle-7.md
  • wiki/guiding-principles/principle-9.md through principle-13.md
  • wiki/guiding-principles/principle-14-containers.md (first “14” in source — multiple homes)
  • wiki/guiding-principles/principle-14-donation-only.md (second “14” in source — donation-only)
  • wiki/guiding-principles/principle-15.md through principle-21.md
  • wiki/guiding-principles/principle-23.md, principle-24.md
• pages updated:
  • wiki/index.md — Guiding Principles section fully populated; numbering-anomaly header note added; principle wikilinks added to Practice/Structure/Message placeholders and to the facilitator fork entry
  • wiki/overview.md — Guiding Principles moved from “needs export” to “ingested, under-review”; added sections for load-bearing statements, friction points, and v3-new statements; surfaced Guide–Traveler ratify-in-advance question; refreshed open questions
  • wiki/practice/structure/twelve-steps.md — converted “(SEW, Principle 2)” string reference to live wikilinks [[principle-2]], [[principle-3]]; no wording change
• forks: no new forks; existing facilitator-pathway-vs-no-professional-class reinforced. Source Open Questions name the Facilitator Development Pathway as in tension with Principle 5, 9, 10 (note: fork file currently lists 6, 9, 10, 11 — the canonical principle-list for the resolved fork is a team call)
• convergence calls: none
• §8 peer-led check: source is strongly aligned (statements 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12 form the structural backbone). No drift toward facilitator/certification in this source.
• numbering anomalies (option A — preserved verbatim per team decision):
  • Gap at 8 — source jumps from 7 to 9 (On Spirituality starts at 9)
  • Duplicate 14 — two distinct statements share label 14 (multiple-homes in Containers section; donation-only in Money section); resolved here as principle-14-containers and principle-14-donation-only, both bearing a visible ⚠️ drift-warning at the top of the page body, not just in frontmatter
  • Gap at 22 — source jumps from 21 to 23 (Outside Issues is 23)
  • Statement count tension — System Map and Open Questions say “22 statements”; source actually contains 23 distinct numbered entries because of the duplicate 14 (or 22 labeled positions, depending on how you count)
  • Inline “Note for team:” pointer drift — multiple inline notes in source reference numbers that no longer match the statements they sit next to. Captured on the affected pages (12, 14-containers, 16, 18, 21, 24) with the original source pointer noted honestly.
  • Open Questions pointer drift — Open Questions reference “Statement 11 (open meeting)” → current 13; “19/20 (Guide–Traveler)” → current 20/21; “Statement 22 (institutional independence)” → current 24.
  • 📌 A future renumber will be a wiki-wide operation. Touches every [[principle-N]] cross-reference across wiki/ (currently in: index, overview, facilitator fork, twelve-steps), plus any string references in purpose.md and the source docs in raw/ (which are immutable — purpose.md would update, raw/ would not). Do not rename principle files in isolation; coordinate.
• review items for the team:
  • Statement 2 wording. Source statement is “Translating the body’s wisdom.” — does NOT contain the word “presencing,” but Open Questions treat “presencing” as the team-pending word for this statement. Likely intent: revise the statement text to carry “presencing.” Confirm.
  • Statement 12 split. Source inline note (labeled to “10” but describing 12) asks whether to split into 12a/12b (no figureheads + attract rather than promote).
  • Statement 21 split. Source inline note (labeled to “20”) asks whether to split into 21a/21b/21c for cleaner cross-referencing.
  • Statement 24 — foundational or preference? Open Questions ask whether “library/practice belong to no one; designed to outlast EPI” is genuinely foundational or a current preference.
  • Friction points. principle-7 (no bolt-ons) and principle-16 (separation from paid work) explicitly named as highest-friction.
  • Guide–Traveler ratify-in-advance. Source flags as an explicit team choice that the Guide–Traveler form (principle-20, principle-21) is in the Guiding Principles but NOT yet a practice in the Men’s Group. Worth deciding deliberately, not by drift.
  • Naming and count. “Guiding Principles” vs “Traditions” vs “Guiding Principles” vs “Principles” still open. Statement count target 12–16 per source; current 22 (or 23, see above).
  • Facilitator fork principle list. Fork file’s related_principles is [6, 9, 10, 11]; source Open Questions name “5, 9, and 10.” Canonical list is a team call — left untouched.
  • Source Julie note. Source contains the line “Julie: simplify instruction language on structure doc and anywhere else.” — surfaced as a Julie-owned action item, not a principle question.

[2026-05-23] ingest | EPI System Map

• source: raw/EPI_System_Map.md — meta-document; names the four co-equal components and the planned document inventory; carries no statement content itself
• layer touched: structural (not principle/tool/wrapper) — yield is the catalog
• pages added: none (intentionally — no typed pages from a source that names documents without carrying their content; pages get born when their actual drafts arrive in raw/)
• pages updated:
  • wiki/index.md — populated full inventory by container, distinguishing needs export (team has written it; awaiting drop into raw/) from needs drafting (System Map names it; not yet written)
  • wiki/overview.md — refreshed 30-second view; foundational-set status section added; surfaced statement-count tension
• forks surfaced: none new · reinforces resolved facilitator-pathway-vs-no-professional-class (Host Orientation framed as “orientation, not certification — Principle 9”)
• convergence calls: none — practice-structure slot still open as before
• §8 peer-led check: source itself is clean; Host Orientation will need a careful check when drafted (sits on the certification line)
• review items for the team:
  • Statement-count tension: System Map says “currently 22”; purpose.md lists count and naming as open. Both can be true; worth surfacing.
  • Sources named-as-existing but not in raw/ and needing export: Guiding Principles v3, Twelve Steps v1, The Practice Cycle, Meeting Script v2
  • Existing wiki/practice/structure/twelve-steps.md is a seeded worked example, not the v1 draft; will need reconciling when the v1 arrives

[2026-05-24] ingest | EPI Twelve Steps v1

• source: raw/EPI_Twelve_Steps_v1.md — Working Draft v1, For Team Review
• layer touched: layer 3 (Wrapper / practice-structure slot) — reconciliation of the seeded worked example against the actual v1 draft text
• pages added: none (v1 content folded into the existing canonical home)
• pages updated:
  • wiki/practice/structure/twelve-steps.md — full v1 step text and commentary embedded (this page is the canonical home for the Steps per System Map / index, so embedding is correct under §6); “On Working the Steps” section added; “Source Open Questions” section added carrying the v1 team-questions verbatim; new “Sponsorship — open question” section; cross-references rendered as likely-intended [[principle-N]] with ⚠️ inline notes preserving the source’s original cited number wherever the v3 numbering does not fit (per team direction this ingest)
  • wiki/index.md — twelve-steps entry flipped from “v1 draft itself needs export” to “v1 draft ingested 2026-05-24”; sponsorship convergence question noted
  • wiki/overview.md — foundational-set entry for Twelve Steps v1 flipped from “needs export” to “ingested”; sponsor-vs-Guide–Traveler added to Open forks (not yet a Fork page — no clean Side A/Side B); Sarah’s Step-12 draft surfaced as a needs-export pointer
• status decision: kept waning per purpose.md. A polished v1 draft in for review does not move the team’s collective stance; it gives them something concrete to evaluate. Flagged this reasoning on the page.
• forks: no new fork pages. Sponsor vs. Guide–Traveler surfaced as an open convergence/naming question — not promoted to a Fork because there is no clean Side A / Side B yet, and the v1’s own Open Questions hold it as an open thread.
• convergence calls: none made. practice-structure slot remains open; Twelve Steps waning, practice-cycle candidate (still needs export), no successor chosen.
• §8 peer-led check: clean. The v1 explicitly defines sponsor as “not a teacher, coach, or authority” — strongly aligned with principle-5, principle-11. No drift toward facilitator/certification.
• pointer drift surfaced (Principle citations against v3 numbering):
  • Step 2 commentary cites “Principle 7” — v3 Principle 7 is “no bolt-on modalities,” does not fit “something larger than the isolated self.” Rendered as [[principle-9]] with ⚠️ note.
  • Step 5 commentary cites “Principle 7” — same mismatch. Rendered as [[principle-9]] with ⚠️ note (the “something larger” pattern is consistent across Steps 2, 5, 11).
  • Step 11 commentary cites “Principle 7” — same mismatch. Rendered as [[principle-9]] with ⚠️ note.
  • Step 12 commentary cites “Principle 15” — v3 Principle 15 is “self-supporting / decline outside funding,” does not fit “carrying the message by living it.” Rendered as [[principle-18]] (carry the message by practicing) with ⚠️ note.
  • “On Working the Steps” cites “Principle 9” alongside Principle 4 for sponsorship. Principle 9 (spiritual, not religious) fits the spiritual frame loosely but the peer-led / not-an-authority claim aligns more directly with principle-5 and principle-11. Rendered as cited with ⚠️ note flagging the alternatives.
  • Step 2 / Step 7 / Step 10 / “On Working” Principle 3 — citations that DO fit v3 were rendered as straight [[principle-N]] links without flags.
• review items for the team:
  • Pointer drift confirmation. Four cross-references were rendered as likely-intended v3 statements ([[principle-9]] x3, [[principle-18]]) with the original source numbers preserved inline. Team to confirm intent so a clean re-cite pass can drop the ⚠️ notes.
  • Sponsor vs. Guide–Traveler. Same 1:1 territory, different naming. Open Questions in v1 already hold sponsorship as a thread. Three branches the team may choose between: fold into Guide–Traveler as a recovery-world synonym; hold as a distinct form with its own page; or treat the sponsor naming itself as part of the recovery-world stigma to move away from. Held as open; not made into a Fork yet.
  • Sarah’s draft of Step 12 — referenced in v1 Open Questions (“having experienced a shift in consciousness as the result of these steps”) but not in raw/. Needs export if the team wants the comparison preserved.
  • The v1 Open Questions — carried verbatim onto the page; not collapsed. Each one is a real decision: length/compression, Step 2 split, Step 7 SEW lock-in, Step 12 arrival-vs-ongoing framing, the “presencing” word, sponsorship, and the relationship to practice-cycle.
  • Waning status reconfirmed. The team may want to revisit this explicitly now that there is a v1 to read — does seeing it whole change the stance, or confirm it?

[2026-05-24] schema | CLAUDE.md §9.a diff-ingest sub-mode added

diff-by-statement (not by line/number); empty-diff→no-op (write nothing, discard copy); delta routing (reword / addition→new page at proposed|candidate / competing-wordings→framing candidate / fork / contradict / meta-comment→ open-questions); large deletions logged, not paged; provenance via dated raw/-revision-/. Derived from the EP-doc copy diff.

[2026-05-25] rename | Integrity Layer → Guiding Principles

• Wiki-wide rename. The container that holds numbered constitutional statements is now called Guiding Principles; individual statements are Principles (“Principle 4” not “Integrity 4”). Done as Pass A in preparation for ingesting v5 strategy doc.
• file moves:
  • folder: wiki/integrity/ → wiki/guiding-principles/
  • files: integrity-N.md → principle-N.md (22 files; duplicate-14 disambiguators preserved as principle-14-containers.md and principle-14-donation-only.md)
• link rewrites: [[integrity-N]] → [[principle-N]] everywhere outside raw/. Frontmatter container: integrity → container: guiding-principles. Prose “Integrity Layer” → “Guiding Principles”; “Integrity N” → “Principle N”. Grammar fixed where the singular “Integrity Layer … is” became plural “Guiding Principles … are”.
• preserved as-is: the source filename raw/EPI_Integrity_Layer_v3.md (raw/ is immutable per §1); the value-word “integrity” in principle-17 (Integrity Over Growth — different sense).
• schema files updated: CLAUDE.md, purpose.md, templates/principle.md, templates/container.md.
• naming open question on purpose.md resolved (chose Guiding Principles). Statement-count question remains open. See glossary.md (added next).
• §8 peer-led check: untouched. Rename is vocabulary, not principle change.

[2026-05-25] ingest | EPI Expansion Strategy v5

• source: raw/EPI_Expansion_Strategy_v5.docx.md — older internal draft for the four-of-us (Aaron, Julie, Sarah, Fred); ingested archivally to crosscheck current wiki state and to catch material we might have dropped.
• layers touched: all three rates of change — tools (layer 1), guiding principles (layer 2) confirmations, wrapper material (layer 3) framings.
• pre-pass: full Pass A rename (Integrity Layer → Guiding Principles) completed first so this ingest filed against the renamed structure.
• new schema additions:
  • glossary.md at vault root — disambiguates the doubled meaning of “three layers” (wiki’s three rates of change vs. v5’s three architectural levels of practice); defines container vocabulary; lists vocabulary to avoid per §8.
  • templates/facet.md — new page type for the Six Facets, sibling to principle. Lives inside Guiding Principles.
  • wiki/practice/framings/ — new subfolder for framing pages.
• pages added (~40):
  • 6 Facet pages in wiki/guiding-principles/facet-*.md, all under-review — Translating the Body’s Wisdom, Navigating Your Inner World, Discovering Your True Power, Getting Unstuck, Aligning with Essence, Living Your Big Life.
  • 3 core Tool pages in wiki/practice/tools/: sew (canonical anchor), inner-map (canonical anchor; includes v5’s “Reactive Brain is not the enemy” caveat as load-bearing), daily-meditation (proposed — 90-second specification new and not team-ratified).
  • 30 deep-dive tool stubs in wiki/practice/tools/, all needs-export, one per named tool in v5 (mapped to primary facet); page exists so each tool is individually navigable; full description awaiting export from team’s Coming Home / Library materials.
  • Safe Harbor statement at wiki/structure/safe-harbor-statement.md, status active — the load-bearing meeting opening with v5’s exact text preserved verbatim.
  • 2 framing-sets in wiki/practice/framings/: accompaniment-role-naming (5 candidates for the 1:1 role) and library-naming (17 candidates for the body of work / archive).
• pages updated:
  • 11 principle pages with ## Source confirmations blocks where v5 independently asserts the same content: 9, 11, 12, 13, 14-donation-only, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21. Each appends the v5 section name and a brief quote.
  • wiki/forks/facilitator-pathway-vs-no-professional-class.md — added ## Language drift in v5 strategy planning (2026-05-25) section flagging steward / facilitator / pod / training vocabulary in v5 Phase 3-4 planning prose; explicitly NOT treated as superseding the fork (drift is in vocabulary, not commitment).
  • wiki/practice/structure/twelve-steps.md — added v5 note: v5 does not move status from waning; surfaces a new open thread about whether Six Facets + Practice Cycle obviate a separate developmental arc.
  • wiki/index.md — added Facets section, full Tools section, Framings section under Practice, Safe Harbor in Structure, v5-confirmation flags on confirmed Principles.
  • wiki/overview.md — full regeneration reflecting v5 ingest state.
• forks surfaced:
  • Six Facets ↔ Guiding Principles relationship — open question, held in wiki/overview.md; not yet a Fork page (no clean Side A / Side B). Three plausible relationships sketched: complementary views of the same constitution / facets as deeper constitution / facets as organizing taxonomy for the Tool library.
• convergence calls: none made. Two framing-sets file candidates side-by-side as candidate per §5; team to converge.
• §8 peer-led check: v5 is substantively aligned with peer-led — the accompaniment, money, Safe Harbor, and four pillars sections all enact Side B of the resolved fork cleanly. BUT v5’s planning vocabulary (Phases 2-4) drifts into Side A terms: steward, facilitator, pod, training, Facilitator Field Guide. Flagged on the fork page; team to either rewrite v5’s planning prose or explicitly defend the vocabulary.
• what was NOT ingested (deliberately):
  • Part Two (Phase 1-4 rollout plans) — project planning, not wiki material per §0. Phase plans live elsewhere (notes, project tracker, or just in raw/ as reference).
  • Part Three (Open Questions) — most are already echoed in purpose.md or overview.md. The few that aren’t (#10 meditation forms specifically) appear as Status Notes on the relevant tool page (daily-meditation) and as Open Questions on framing-sets.
  • Part Four (recommended meeting actions) — meeting agenda, not wiki content.
• review items for the team:
  • Six Facets relationship to Guiding Principles. The most consequential structural question raised by v5. Currently filed in wiki/guiding-principles/ as sibling page type to principle, but this is a placeholder until the team explicitly decides. Three options surfaced in wiki/overview.md.
  • 90-second meditation specification. New from v5; not team- ratified. daily-meditation held as proposed. Team to confirm the 90-second bar and the three starter forms.
  • Reactive Brain is not the enemy caveat. v5 explicitly names this as the correction most likely to be lost at scale. Embedded in inner-map page directly so it travels with the tool. Team to confirm the wording.
  • Accompaniment role naming. Five candidates in accompaniment-role-naming: Guide/Traveler (current), Walking Partner, Practice Partner, Companion, Accompanier. Team to converge.
  • Library naming. 17 candidates in library-naming; v5 working title is Coming Home. Team to converge.
  • Deep-dive tool descriptions. 30 stubs awaiting export. Each is named only in v5; canonical descriptions live in the team’s existing Coming Home / Library materials. Needs export to populate.
  • v5 planning vocabulary drift. Steward, facilitator, pod, training in Phase 3-4 prose. Flagged on the fork page. Team to rewrite or defend.
  • Phase plans. Not ingested. If the team wants Phase 1-4 work tracked somewhere, decide where (not in wiki/).

[2026-05-25] ingest | Inner Map diagram (canonical Tool source)

• source: /assets/Inner-Map-24x36-1-scaled.png — the 24×36 canonical Inner Map poster by Julia Colwell, PhD (The Colwell Practice). Lineage credit on diagram: David Hawkins’s Map of Consciousness®.
• file move: PNG was placed at raw/ root; moved to /assets/ per CLAUDE.md §1 (/assets/ for images).
• layer touched: layer 1 (Tools — canonical core). This is the first proper canonical population of inner-map; the prior content was 24-hour-old anchor placeholder from v5 commentary only. Per §3 this is a deliberate, logged tool event — no ## Prior version needed because anchor placeholder is not prior canonical content.
• pages updated:
  • wiki/practice/tools/inner-map.md — promoted from anchor to full canonical writeup. Diagram embedded; full vertical-axis states list transcribed (Power Over: Pride / Anger / Fear-Agitated; Power Under: Fear-Frozen / Sadness / Despair / Guilt / Shame / Death; Evolutionary Power: Neutrality / Acceptance / Appreciation / Love / Joy / Peace); the Bridge (“Willingness to shift and see self as creator”) named as the move; ESSENCE/EGO labels preserved verbatim from diagram; “Reactive Brain is not the enemy” caveat from v5 retained as load-bearing commentary (the diagram’s EGO label and vertical hierarchy could enable the spiritual-bypass misread on their own — the caveat is what protects against it).
  • wiki/practice/tools/power-with-over-under.md — raised from “named only” to “partially depicted.” Power Over and Power Under appear directly on the Inner Map as right-axis labels; Power With is named in v5 but not depicted on the diagram. Still needs-export overall pending the full tool description.
  • wiki/guiding-principles/facet-discovering-true-power.md — added “Where this lives visually” section noting the diagram depicts this facet’s territory directly via the Power axis.
  • wiki/guiding-principles/facet-aligning-with-essence.md — added “Where this lives visually” section noting the upper register of the diagram (Neutrality through Peace) IS this facet’s territory.
• forks surfaced: none new in the strict sense, but:
  • EGO label vs. “Reactive Brain is brilliant” framing tension — the diagram’s EGO label is more pejorative than v5’s careful framing. Caveat preserved as load-bearing commentary; if the team decides to rewrite the EGO label on a future poster revision, that would itself be a deliberate Tool change per §3.
  • The Colwell Practice attribution. The diagram credits The Colwell Practice as institutional source. Flagged on inner-map under Source and attribution as a team- clarification item — wiki cannot determine on its own whether EPI = The Colwell Practice, sister organizations, or another arrangement. Honor-the-lineage tone elsewhere in the wiki (AA acknowledgment on twelve-steps) suggests explicit acknowledgment is the move regardless of the institutional structure.
• convergence calls: none.
• §8 peer-led check: clean. Tool content; no host/facilitator/steward vocabulary on the diagram itself.
• review items for the team:
  • The Colwell Practice attribution. See above. Most consequential item from this ingest.
  • EGO label vs. v5’s framing. Both preserved; team to decide whether to harmonize at next deliberate Tool revision.
  • Julia Colwell’s book as canonical long-form source. Likely the canonical long-form description of the Inner Map lives in “The Inner Map: Navigating Your Emotions to Create the World You Want.” If so, the wiki should name it explicitly so it can be referenced. Not currently in raw/.
  • “How to read the map” wrapper content. The diagram + caveat together don’t tell a newcomer how to actually use the map. A wrapper-layer framing (held as framing candidate per §5) would belong if and when drafted — but not in this ingest.

[2026-05-24] ingest | 2025 ILC Master Curriculum (AT version)

• source: raw/2025 ILC Version AT Master Curriculum.docx.md — 987 lines. The 2025 ILC (Immersive Learning Community) master curriculum, “AT” version. 13-week structured teaching curriculum (Level 1: Fundamentals of Evolutionary Power) plus a Level II ongoing outline organized by the Six Facets. First major export of TOOL CONTENT the wiki has seen.
• layer touched:
  • layer 1 (Tools) — substantively. 13 stubs filled and 1 canonical anchor updated (see pages updated below).
  • layer 3 (Wrapper) — DEFERRED per team decision this ingest. The 13-week Fundamentals arc and the Six-Facets Level II arc are both candidate wrapper models embedded in the source, plus the facilitator-led framing throughout would naturally produce a structured-curriculum-vs-open-meeting fork. None of that filed here; see deferred work below.
• pages added: none (all touched pages already existed as stubs)
• pages updated (13 stubs promoted from needs-export → canonical, plus 1 anchor rewritten):
  • Translating the Body’s Wisdom (facet):
    • sew — substantively rewritten from curriculum Weeks 2–3. Prior body was a 24-hour-old anchor populated from v5 only and self-described as preliminary “needs fuller export”; treated as anchor placeholder, not prior canonical, so no ## Prior version section needed under §3. One v5 sentence preserved verbatim (“Sensation interrupts story. Emotion interrupts defense. Want restores agency.”) where it compresses the move cleanly.
    • experiencing-your-feelings — Week 5
    • emotional-cycles — Weeks 2 and 5
    • full-body-yes-no — Week 3
    • sourcing-your-own-safety — Week 4
  • Discovering Your True Power (facet):
    • karpman-triangle — Weeks 8 and 9 combined
    • four-pillars-of-integrity — Week 7
    • incompletion-inventory — Week 7
  • Navigating Your Inner World (facet):
    • withhold-withdraw-project — Week 6 (the curriculum files this under “Translating the Body’s Wisdom” but the wiki’s facet assignment is facet-getting-unstuck — preserved as-is; team may want to revisit facet placement of W/W/P)
    • projection-work — Weeks 6 and 11 (split-content tool: W/W/P holds the clearing form, Projection Work holds the ongoing recognition practice)
    • personas — Weeks 10 and 11 combined
    • persona-interviews — Weeks 10 and 11
  • Aligning with Essence (facet):
    • intentions — Week 1
    • commitments — Week 1
• forks: none filed (per team decision — see deferred work).
• convergence calls: none.
• §8 peer-led check — load-bearing concern for the source as a whole:
  • The curriculum’s delivery form is structurally facilitator-led: recurring [FACILITATION] headings, teach→demo→breakout→integrate flow, “Watch one, do one, teach one — RIPPLERS!”, buddy assignments, Mighty Networks infrastructure, 13-week schedule, the ILC’s own mission statement (“loving container for personal transformation”).
  • The tool content itself, exported here, is layer 1 and aligned with the practice. The drift is in the wrapper (how the curriculum delivers the tools), and per team decision this ingest, the wrapper layer is deferred entirely. Tool pages strip the teaching framing on export.
  • When the wrapper layer is taken up (Wave C / future), this is the fork that needs to open: structured curriculum (ILC) vs. open peer meeting as the primary delivery container.
• deferred work (logged here so a future ingest can pick it up cleanly, not lost):
  • Wave B — small new pages from this source, not yet filed:
    • Arguable vs. Unarguable — a recurring discipline across SEW, W/W/P, Projection Work, Karpman Triangle. Currently captured inside each page. Probably wants its own tool or framing page.
    • Bodify — recurring micro-practice (“Bodify current state,” “Bodify a persona you’ve discovered”). Currently lives inside SEW; may want its own short tool page or a glossary entry.
    • ULP / Upper Limit Problem — referenced multiple times (“Introduction: ULPs”, “Remember the ULP”, “Playing with ULPs”) without definition. Hendricks term. Worth a tool page once a definition is exported.
    • Genius Quadrant, I Choose Happy, Climbing the Inner Map, Persona Mapping — named in Level II as applied tools but not described in this source. needs-export still applies.
    • Framings to consider: Challenge by choice, Learning model not pathology, Play, Watch one, do one, teach one / Ripplers, Influence not control, No compromise.
  • Wave C — wrapper / model layer, deliberately not filed:
    • ILC Fundamentals Arc — the 13-week Level 1 structure as a candidate model ALTERNATIVE_TO twelve-steps and practice-cycle in the practice-structure slot.
    • Six-Facets Developmental Arc — the Level II ongoing structure as a candidate model (possibly a different slot than Fundamentals — ongoing-practice rather than onboarding).
    • Structured-curriculum-vs-open-meeting fork — the §8 tension above, made into a visible Fork page.
  • Handouts referenced by the curriculum but not in raw/: Why bodify?, SEW, Color in Body (where are emotions located?), Full Body Yes/No, Cynthia’s handout for sourcing safety, Emotions Flowchart, Relationship Skills Workbook / Relationship Ride (Hendricks), Withhold/Withdraw/Project, Rocketship: Energy Leaks/Plugs, Incompletion Inventory, Persona Chart, Persona Interview, Victim Questionnaire (Ethel Greene), Getting out of the Triangle, Coaching Another to Get Out of the Triangle, Shift List, Hendricks Commitments (from the ILC manual). All cited on the relevant tool pages as “needs-export as separate assets.”
• review items for the team:
  • “No compromise” vs. “great agreements” — surfaced on full-body-yes-no as a friction worth team discussion. They likely complement each other (name the want unarguably first; then craft the agreement) but the surface tension is real and deserves explicit language.
  • The 5th emotion — the curriculum names Sexual / Aroused / Creative as a 5th primary emotion alongside Mad/Sad/Glad/Scared. This is preserved in sew and emotional-cycles. Other EPI materials may use 4 emotions; worth team check.
  • Tonglen / chanting / sounding reference — Level II Living Your Big Life lists Tonglen, chanting, sounding as tools to support expansive living. Tonglen is a Tibetan Buddhist practice; principle-9 holds spiritual not religious. Not a violation (Principle 9 is under-review), but the specific Buddhist attribution is worth being deliberate about — name it or use a non-tradition-specific framing.
  • W/W/P facet placement — the curriculum files Withhold/Withdraw/ Project under “Translating the Body’s Wisdom” (Week 6). The wiki’s [[withhold-withdraw-project]] is filed under facet-getting-unstuck. Both readings have merit. Team to confirm or rebalance.
  • The ILC as a container — the ILC itself (Immersive Learning Community) is named in the source as a specific delivery form. The wiki currently has no container page for the ILC. When the wrapper layer is taken up, the team should decide whether the ILC is a recognized EPI container alongside the open meeting and the Guide–Traveler relationship, or a transitional form, or something else.
  • “Watch one, do one, teach one — RIPPLERS!” — vocabulary close to the superseded facilitator-development pathway (see facilitator-pathway-vs-no-professional-class). Not treated as a violation here (the principles in question are under-review), but flagged so the team can take a clean position when the wrapper layer is taken up.

[2026-05-24] ingest | 2025 ILC Master Curriculum — Wave B (small new pages)

• source: same as Wave A (raw/2025 ILC Version AT Master Curriculum.docx.md)
• continuation of the 2026-05-24 ingest; same source, second wave per the three-wave plan agreed at Wave A. Wave B covers concepts that recur across multiple ILC tools but had no home in the wiki, plus three newcomer-facing framings drawn from Week 1 of the curriculum.
• layer touched:
  • layer 1 (Tools) — 3 new tool pages (2 canonical, 1 needs-export stub for cross-linkability).
  • layer 2/3 (Framings) — 3 new framing pages, all candidate. Wiki’s framing page type used for the first time as a single-framing (rather than framing-set) page — framings/ folder previously only held accompaniment-role-naming and library-naming, both framing-sets.
  • glossary — one new vocabulary entry (Bodify), under a new Practice vocabulary section.
• pages added:
  • Tools:
    • arguable-vs-unarguable · canonical · the discipline that runs across SEW, projection-work, withhold-withdraw-project, karpman-triangle, and four-pillars-of-integrity (Pillar 2). Appears so often across the curriculum’s core tools that it deserved its own page rather than living scattered inside each.
    • bodify · canonical · the verb form of dropping into the body now and (when emotion is present) letting the body express it physically. Closely paired with SEW and Experiencing Your Feelings; filed as both a tool page (the practice) AND a glossary entry (the vocabulary discipline) per team decision this ingest, so the wiki has both a navigable practice home and a consistent word usage.
    • upper-limit-problem · needs-export · Hendricks term (The Big Leap, 2009) referenced 3× in the curriculum without definition. Filed as a stub at needs-export per established wiki pattern so other tool pages have something to link to; provisional description from lineage included with a clear note that it is provisional and awaits team or source canonical wording.
  • Framings (all candidate):
    • challenge-by-choice · frames how participation in a container works — “you decide, you risk”. Enacts peer-led consent at the participation level; aligns with principle-19, sourcing-your-own-safety, safe-harbor-statement.
    • learning-model-not-pathology · frames the basic stance toward one’s own experience and personas. Aligns with principle-19, principle-9, personas, karpman-triangle. Removes the medical/clinical lens.
    • play · frames the basic mood of the practice; Improv’s yes, and as the structural opposite of Reactive Brain’s no, but. Aligns with inner-map’s Creative Brain; includes a load-bearing caveat against premature play as Hero-on-self bypass.
• pages updated:
  • /glossary.md — added new Practice vocabulary section, with Bodify as its first entry. Section header is forward-compatible for future vocabulary entries.
  • wiki/index.md — added the 3 new tools to the deep-dive lists under the appropriate facets (translating-body-wisdom for arguable-vs-unarguable and bodify; aligning-with-essence for upper-limit-problem). Added the 3 new framings under Framings (candidate wordings).
• forks: none filed. The deferred wrapper-layer fork (structured-curriculum-vs-open-meeting) remains explicitly deferred per Wave A decision.
• convergence calls: none.
• §8 peer-led check: clean on all 6 new pages.
• deliberately NOT filed in Wave B (continued from Wave A’s deferred list — kept here so the deferred set stays visible):
  • Framings not filed: RIPPLERS / Watch one, do one, teach one (peer-led drift vocabulary, already flagged in Wave A log; belongs to wrapper-layer conversation), Influence not control (already adequately captured inside sew), No compromise (already flagged as team-review item on full-body-yes-no; don’t double-file before team weighs in).
  • Wave C still entirely deferred: ILC Fundamentals Arc (13-week model), Six-Facets Developmental Arc (Level II model), structured-curriculum-vs-open-meeting fork.
  • 17 handouts referenced by the curriculum but not in raw/ — still open; listed in full in the Wave A log entry.
  • Other concepts named but undescribed in the curriculum: Genius Quadrant, I Choose Happy, Climbing the Inner Map, Persona Mapping — still needs-export; no stubs filed for these because they are named only in Level II as applied tools without enough surrounding context to file a useful stub.
• review items for the team (new from Wave B):
  • Upper Limit Problem provisional description. The stub includes a provisional description from the Hendricks lineage (The Big Leap, 2009). Team to confirm or replace with the team’s own canonical wording.
  • Bodify two-page filing. The team chose to file Bodify as BOTH a tool page and a glossary entry. The current arrangement has the practice page point to the glossary for vocabulary discipline and the glossary point back to the practice page. Confirm this is the intended pattern for vocabulary-with-its-own- practice items; if so, it sets a precedent for similar future items.

[2026-05-24] ingest | 2025 ILC Master Curriculum — Wave C (wrapper layer)

• source: same as Waves A and B (raw/2025 ILC Version AT Master Curriculum.docx.md); completes the three-wave plan agreed at Wave A.
• continuation of the 2026-05-24 ingest; Wave C is the wrapper-layer pass. The §8 peer-led tension that was deliberately held back in Waves A and B is now made visible through an open three-sided fork rather than being silently resolved or quietly ignored.
• layer touched:
  • layer 3 (Wrapper / Model) — two new model pages in wiki/practice/structure/, filed in two new slots (onboarding-arc, ongoing-competency-arc).
  • layer 3 (Fork) — one new OPEN fork page in wiki/forks/, three-sided per team decision this ingest.
  • taxonomy — slot taxonomy formalized in /glossary.md so future ingests don’t silently invent new slot values.
  • existing page update — twelve-steps.md updated to reflect the distinct-slots taxonomy (its alternative_to cleared; practice-cycle is in a different slot now, not an alternative).
• pages added:
  • ilc-fundamentals-arc · model · candidate · slot onboarding-arc · captures the 13-week Level 1 sequence as a candidate onboarding shape. Layer note up top distinguishes the sequence (filed here) from the delivery format (held in the fork). Hosts an explicit table of the 13 weeks with tool cross-references.
  • six-facets-developmental-arc · model · candidate · slot ongoing-competency-arc · captures the Level II ongoing structure as competency-by-facet, with each facet’s “I…” statements and the tools that serve them.
  • structured-curriculum-vs-open-meeting · fork · OPEN · three-sided per team decision: A) ILC as valued teaching container, B) ILC in active tension with peer-led, C) reformed- ILC middle path. Each side’s strongest case stated honestly with what it gets right and what it accepts as cost. NOT resolved.
• pages updated:
  • twelve-steps — frontmatter alternative_to cleared (was [practice-cycle, (future models)]; the distinct-slots taxonomy means practice-cycle is in a different slot now and not an alternative). Body’s Coexisting candidates section rewritten to reflect the four-slot taxonomy and the live discernment still needed in the developmental-arc slot. No change to the Twelve Steps content itself or to the waning status.
  • /glossary.md — new Practice-structure slots section added with the four slot names, the question each answers, and a discipline note (“do not silently invent a new slot value”).
  • wiki/index.md — Structure section rewritten to surface the four slots explicitly; each model filed under its slot with a note that pages in different slots are not alternatives. Forks section gains the new OPEN fork entry.
• forks: ONE new fork opened. structured-curriculum-vs-open-meeting · OPEN · three-sided. The ILC’s facilitator-led delivery vocabulary (facilitator/demonstrate/RIPPLERS/watch-one-do-one-teach-one) in conversation with the peer-led principles (principle-6, principle-9, principle-10, principle-11, principle-12, principle-19) — and the resolved facilitator-pathway-vs-no-professional-class fork that shares vocabulary with the ILC. Reads as a continuation of the conversation that fork held, not as a reopening of it.
• convergence calls: none. Three sides held; team decides.
• §8 peer-led check:
  • On the model pages themselves: clean. Both pages distinguish sequence/competency from delivery format; the layer-1 tool content sequenced and the delivery vocabulary held separately.
  • On the fork page: the §8 check is itself the subject of the fork, so the page surfaces it explicitly rather than enforcing a direction. Per CLAUDE.md §11: “Hold both. Help them converge. Never decide for them.”
• review items for the team (new from Wave C):
  • The fork itself. Whether the three sides as drafted capture the team’s real positions. Each side’s “what it gets right” and “what it accepts as cost” are the team’s to confirm, revise, or replace.
  • Slot taxonomy. Whether onboarding-arc, ongoing-competency-arc, practice-structure, and in-the-moment-form are the right four slots — or whether the team wants to collapse, expand, or rename them. The taxonomy matters because it determines what counts as an “alternative” in the wiki.
  • Twelve-Steps + Six-Facets-Developmental-Arc: complementary or competing? The two arcs answer “what does long-term practice look like?” in different shapes. The wiki currently files them in adjacent slots so they can coexist. If the team decides they’re really competing for the same role, that’s a slot collapse worth surfacing.
  • “Reformed-ILC” as a real possibility. Side C of the fork proposes that the curriculum’s tool exposition is separable from its delivery format. The team is best positioned to say whether this is a real hypothesis worth trialing or whether the two are more entangled than the fork implies.
• deferred / still open:
  • Wave C did NOT open a separate ILC container page (per team decision this ingest). If the team later wants to file the ILC as a recognized container alongside the open meeting, that becomes a separate Wave at a future date.
  • 17 handouts referenced by the curriculum but not in raw/ — still open from Wave A (listed in full there).
  • Concepts named but undescribed in the curriculum (Genius Quadrant, I Choose Happy, Climbing the Inner Map, Persona Mapping) — still needs-export.
• this completes the three-wave ILC ingest. Future work on this source would be picking up the 17 handouts as they appear in raw/, filling the remaining needs-export tools, or responding to the team’s discernment on the new fork.