EPI — A Peer-Led Practice of Presencing

commitments

5 min read

✎ Edit this page on GitHub

Commitments

What it is

The practice of organizing one’s energies toward something — and of naming that organization, out loud, as a deliberate act.

The working definition the curriculum quotes directly: “Commitment is an organization of energy towards.” (Gay Hendricks.) A second working definition: “You can tell what we are committed to by the results we create.” (Gay Hendricks.) Commitments are not promises; they are how the practitioner sets the container of their own energy.

A commitment, in this framing:

  • is not a promise. Promises about outcomes are usually out of integrity from the start (the body knows you cannot guarantee them).
  • is renewable. You get to recommit as many times as it takes. This is not failure; it is the practice.
  • sets a direction, not a guaranteed destination.

The sailing metaphor the curriculum uses: if you are sailing to a point, you commit and recommit over time, through currents and changing winds, to get there. This is the heart of how commitment operates in EPI — a pivotal connection of the work.

Process commitments vs. outcome commitments

⚠️ Load-bearing distinction preserved. The curriculum names a single move that resolves most commitment trouble: switch from outcome commitments to process commitments.

  • Outcome commitment: “I promise I’ll never be late again.” The body can feel that this is not the truth — you cannot control outcome. You are already out of alignment.
  • Process commitment: “I commit to being in the flow of time and communicating my process impeccably.” This takes the practitioner into the flow of life and their own integrity.

The shift matters because outcome commitments invite leaks the moment they are made; process commitments are commitments to how I am organizing my energy, which is the only thing the practitioner actually controls.

The move

  1. Speak the commitment out loud. Reading commitments aloud, with attention to what arises in the body, is the practice — not a formality. The body’s response is the truth-check.
  2. Notice the body. Stand, speak the commitment, notice what happens. Is there tightening? Resistance? Spaciousness? Settling? The sensation reveals what is in integrity and what is not.
  3. Move through whatever arises. If a commitment surfaces resistance, run sew through that — sensation, emotion, and the want underneath. Do not push past the body; let it complete and see what the commitment looks like on the other side.
  4. Frame in the present and the positive. Same rules as intentions — present-tense, positive form (“I commit to speaking my truth” not “I won’t withhold”).
  5. Distinguish process from outcome. If a commitment is shaped around an outcome you do not control, reshape it as a commitment to the process you do.
  6. Recommit as often as it takes. Every recommitment is the practice. There is no “broken” commitment in a way that ends the game; there is only the next recommitment.

Conscious commitments interrupt unconscious ones

Make conscious commitments so that your life is not overtaken by unconscious ones. Every life is run by commitments — the only question is whether they are named. The unnamed ones tend to be old, inherited, or persona-driven. Naming a commitment in the present is the move of taking authorship.

How commitments differ from intentions

  • intentions name what I am bringing. They are broader, upstream, more spacious.
  • Commitments name how I am organizing my energies toward something specific. They live closer to action and to integrity.

Both are present-tense, positive-form moves. Both are practiced out loud. Together with manifesto (the consolidated me made manifest), they form the named direction the practitioner is moving in.

In the meeting and the practice

Commitments often anchor the opening of a container — read aloud, felt in the body, recommitted to in this moment. They also anchor the practitioner’s daily orientation when speaking them solo.

The curriculum references reading Hendricks’s commitments from the manual — a specific list the team uses — as the canonical example. That list is needs-export as a separate asset when the team is ready.

Why this matters

  • A commitment is the practice of living in integrity. (See four-pillars-of-integrity, Pillar 3.)
  • Process commitments keep the practitioner where their power is.
  • Recommitment is the practice — not perfect adherence.

Facets served

Source and attribution

Primary source: raw/2025 ILC Version AT Master Curriculum.docx.md, Week 1 (Welcome / Get Started). The curriculum references Hendricks’s Commitments as a manual handout — needs-export as a separate asset when the team is ready.

Lineage: Gay Hendricks. The two operational definitions on this page are quoted directly from him in the curriculum.

Status notes

canonical — promoted from needs-export 2026-05-24 from the ILC master curriculum (Week 1).

Referenced by

Graph View

Backlinks